I closed the post by asking what the News Corp. board would do, as they are, ultimately, responsible. When would they hold Murdoch to account for his company's failings?
Today's New York Times has a deliciously acerbic answer: Not anytime soon, thank you very much. (Article, by David Carr, here)
As Carr writes, "Being a board member of News Corporation is not a bad gig; it pays over $200,000 a year and requires lifting nothing heavier than a rubber stamp."
The board is independent only in name, and barely in that (board members are listed here). There are a bunch of Murdochs there, plus others who may at first glance appear to be independent, but whose connections to the family just aren't immediately obvious:
- Natalie Bancroft, an opera singer. Opera singer? Oh yes, and a member of the Bancroft family, that made a lot of money selling Dow Jones (and its crown jewel, The Wall Street Journal) to News Corp.
- Viet Dinh, a law professor at Georgetown. Also: a former Bush administration official, and godfather to Lachlan Murdoch's son.
- Sir Roderick Eddington, of JP Morgan. Formerly: a deputy chairman of a News Corp. division.
- Andrew S. B. Knight, of J Rothschild Capital Management Ltd. Another former senior News Corp. executive.
- And so on.
Isn't it time for genuinely independent boards? Past time, I'd say.
No comments:
Post a Comment